Title: A Comparative Analysis of Plomp and 4D Development Models - A Systematic Review for Dissertation. Research Model Selection
Authors: Irfan Ananda Ismail, Mawardi Mawardi, Lufri Lufri, Usmeldi, Festiyed
Volume: 8
Issue: 11
Pages: 158-170
Publication Date: 2024/11/28
Abstract:
This study conducted a systematic review and comparative analysis of the Plomp and 4D development models in the context of dissertation research in science education. The research aimed to provide a comprehensive framework for model selection to guide researchers in making informed methodological decisions. A systematic literature review was performed following PRISMA guidelines, analyzing 22 articles from major academic databases. The study examined the characteristics, applications, strengths, and limitations of both models. Results revealed the Plomp model as a more reliable, holistic, and adaptable choice for dissertation research compared to the 4D model. The Plomp model demonstrated strengths in comprehensive problem analysis, flexibility, integration of theory and practice, and potential for generating both practical outcomes and theoretical contributions. It was found particularly suitable for addressing complex educational challenges in diverse contexts like Indonesia. The study highlighted the importance of considering contextual factors, research objectives, and desired outcomes when selecting a development model. The findings provide valuable insights for researchers, educational institutions, and policymakers to enhance the quality and impact of dissertation research in science education. This comparative analysis contributes to advancing educational research methodologies and informing evidence-based practices in science education.