Title: Comparative Analysis of Waterfall and Agile Methodologies in Microsoft
Authors: Rana Ayed Alanazi and Dr. Omar Alrwais
Volume: 8
Issue: 11
Pages: 1-1
Publication Date: 2024/11/28
Abstract:
Microsoft used to manage projects by following the Waterfall software development approach which is appropriate for projects that aim to deliver predictable outcomes. But the Waterfall method's rigidity, and one-step-at-a-time approach is not only restrictive in terms of quick changes in customer and market requirements but is also time-consuming and less scalable in the event of the introduction of new technologies. This paper discusses the shift that Microsoft made from using the Waterfall system to Agile methods, thereby weighing the pros, cons, and effectiveness measures. Moreover, this essay compares Agile, an iterative project nature, with the Waterfall traditional method based on project period records, cost efficiency, defect rates on projects' performance rates, and customer satisfaction. New technologies that change everything rise rapidly to meet the needs of transforming industries and setting new standards; likewise, Agile software development explodes quickly in companies as a groundbreaking way to handle software projects. This paper identified vital benefits that Agile offers over the Waterfall methodology, including higher agility levels in customizing user stories and delivering customer-specific solutions in an efficient and rapid manner. Also, Agile's flexibility requires ongoing customer participation, particularly in highly complex and dynamic projects. Emerging software development techniques with Microsoft's recent, flush disposition in favor of hybrid methods in organizations with different project categories is an insight that is explored by this essay.